Topic summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video487 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Family Reconciliation results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 211 hits. Analysis detected 1,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,948 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (7,148 of 23,640 topics). This Family Reconciliation is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Family Reconciliation
Topic details
Total words: 1,948
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.8%10.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.7%7.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos