Topic summary
⁠10%1 analyzed article/video819 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Family Legacies results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 352 hits. Analysis detected 1,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (17,704 of 22,819 topics). This Family Legacies is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Family Legacies
Topic details
Total words: 3,276
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510022.4% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.7%10.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos