Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Family Finance results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 332 hits. Analysis detected 1,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (3,672 of 15,397 topics). This Family Finance is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Family Finance
Topic details
Total words: 1,508
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.2% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 22.0%22.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 14.5%14.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.3%15.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos