Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Family Finance results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Indoctrination , and Framing Effect , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 332 hits . Analysis detected 1,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (3,672 of 15,397 topics). This Family Finance is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. Family Finance
Topic details
Total words: 1,508
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.2% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 22.0% 22.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Composition/Division: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst