Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 396 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Family Feuds results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 174 hits . Analysis detected 1,400 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,584 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 72% (4,706 of 16,562 topics). This Family Feuds is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group. Family Feuds
Topic details
Total words: 1,584
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.6% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.3%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst