Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fake Books results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 518 hits. Analysis detected 2,411 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,194 of 16,562 topics). This Fake Books is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Fake Books
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,116
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510062.6% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.5%24.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.0%16.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos