Topic summary
⁠57%2 analyzed articles/videos156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Faith And Politics results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 877 hits. Analysis detected 7,039 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,266 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,516 of 15,792 topics). This Faith And Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Faith And Politics
Topic details
Total words: 4,266
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.4% percentile
4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 18.5%18.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 20.6%20.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.4%11.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos