Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video789 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Faculty Unions results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30% saturation with 709 hits. Analysis detected 3,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,367 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,613 of 16,559 topics). This Faculty Unions is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Faculty Unions
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠73%Faculty Unions (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,367
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.1% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.8%27.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.2%8.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 29.9%29.9%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 29.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.6%Red Herring: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos