Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Faculty Relations results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 564 hits. Analysis detected 4,219 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,494 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,285 of 16,562 topics). This Faculty Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group.
Faculty Relations
Topic details
Total words: 2,494
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510080.2% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.6%22.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.4%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos