Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Facial Recognition Technology results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Slippery Slope, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 3,724 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,210 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Facial Recognition Technology is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Facial Recognition Technology
Topic details
Total words: 3,210
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos