Topic summary
91% 1 analyzed article/video 556 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Facetime Scams results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 311 hits . Analysis detected 1,696 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 75% (4,188 of 16,562 topics). This Facetime Scams is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group. Facetime Scams
Topic details
Total words: 1,668
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.7% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 18.6% 18.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.1% False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.5% Middle Ground: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst