Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video800 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Faa Regulations results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 169 hits. Analysis detected 1,450 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,155 of 16,562 topics). This Faa Regulations is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Faa Regulations
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠33%Faa Regulations (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,200
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Middle Ground: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos