Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video688 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eye Care Practices results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 321 hits. Analysis detected 1,630 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,265 of 16,562 topics). This Eye Care Practices is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Eye Care Practices
Topic details
Total words: 2,752
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.1% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Composition/Division: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos