Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Exploited Vulnerabilities results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 375 hits . Analysis detected 1,316 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Exploited Vulnerabilities is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Exploited Vulnerabilities
Topic details
Total words: 1,624
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 23.1% 23.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.1% 13.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst