Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video1,143 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Exonerations results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 685 hits. Analysis detected 3,069 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ā 32% (11,300 of 16,562 topics). This Exonerations is better (less manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group.
Exonerations
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 32%Exonerations (selected)3%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,572
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510031.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.0%15.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos