Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Existential Risk From AI results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 874 hits. Analysis detected 7,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Existential Risk From AI is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Existential Risk From AI
Topic details
Total words: 9,660
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.1%9.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Straw Man: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos