Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Exhibition Coverage results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 972 hits. Analysis detected 4,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,470 of 16,562 topics). This Exhibition Coverage is worse (more manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.
Exhibition Coverage
Topic details
Total words: 2,756
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510085.1% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 35.3%35.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 24.2%24.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.1%12.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 19.3%19.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Topic 35.3%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 24.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos