Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Exhibition results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36% saturation with 2,220 hits . Analysis detected 6,571 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,243 topics). This Exhibition is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Exhibition
Topic details
Total words: 6,168
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 36.0% 36.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 36.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst