Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executive Time results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 1,352 hits. Analysis detected 6,898 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,444 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (7,978 of 16,562 topics). This Executive Time is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Executive Time
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,444
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.8% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos