Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video401 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executive Branch Ethics results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 63.2% saturation with 1,013 hits. Analysis detected 5,681 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (780 of 16,562 topics). This Executive Branch Ethics is worse (more manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group.
Executive Branch Ethics
Topic details
Total words: 1,604
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510095.3% percentile
12.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 63.1%63.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 49.9%49.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 56.7%56.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 38.0%38.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 22.9%22.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 23.1%23.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 12.2%12.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 63.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 56.7%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 49.9%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 38.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 28.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 22.9%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos