Topic summary
⁠11%1 analyzed article/video332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evidence Sharing results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 671 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,033 of 16,562 topics). This Evidence Sharing is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Evidence Sharing
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠58%Evidence Sharing (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,328
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.5% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos