Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video789 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Everyday Sexism results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 301 hits. Analysis detected 2,135 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,367 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,465 of 16,562 topics). This Everyday Sexism is better (less manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Everyday Sexism
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠49%Everyday Sexism (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,367
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.9% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.7%12.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos