Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,465 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evan Longoria results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 361 hits. Analysis detected 2,154 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,860 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (15,615 of 16,562 topics). This Evan Longoria is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group.
Evan Longoria
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,860
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

6% percentile
02550751005.7% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos