Topic summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video759 analyzed words
BS Summary: These European Migrant Crisis results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 300 hits. Analysis detected 2,436 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (11,854 of 22,433 topics). This European Migrant Crisis is better (less manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group.
European Migrant Crisis
Topic details
Total words: 3,036
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos