Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These European Defense results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 1,491 hits. Analysis detected 6,931 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,547 of 16,562 topics). This European Defense is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
European Defense
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,588
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.4% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 22.6%22.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 15.7%15.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 15.7%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos