Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video573 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Euclid Space Telescope results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 262 hits. Analysis detected 1,796 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,654 of 16,562 topics). This Euclid Space Telescope is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Euclid Space Telescope
Topic details
Total words: 2,292
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.9% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.9%8.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos