Topic summary
ā 26%1 analyzed article/video1,402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ethical Considerations results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Sunk Cost Effect, Recency Bias, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 144 hits. Analysis detected 2,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,206 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ā 7% (15,417 of 16,562 topics). This Ethical Considerations is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Ethical Considerations
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 7%Ethical Considerations (selected)2%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,206
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751006.9% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos