Topic summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ethical Behavior results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 313 hits. Analysis detected 1,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,526 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,530 of 15,966 topics). This Ethical Behavior is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Ethical Behavior
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,526
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Middle Ground: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos