Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,922 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ethical Ai results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Optimism Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 510 hits. Analysis detected 5,841 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (13,013 of 16,562 topics). This Ethical Ai is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
Ethical Ai
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,688
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510021.4% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos