Topic summary
42% 1 analyzed article/video 674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Estate Disputes results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Self-Serving Bias , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 190 hits . Analysis detected 1,593 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,022 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 59% (6,848 of 16,562 topics). This Estate Disputes is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. Estate Disputes
Topic details
Total words: 2,022
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.7% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Special Pleading: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.0% Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst