Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video793 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Espn Ratings results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 1,507 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,379 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,904 of 16,562 topics). This Espn Ratings is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Espn Ratings
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,379
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.8%8.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.0%Straw Man: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos