Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video641 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erling Haaland results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 1,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,445 of 16,562 topics). This Erling Haaland is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Erling Haaland
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,564
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.1% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.3%7.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos