Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Equinox results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 482 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,576 of 16,562 topics). This Equinox is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Equinox
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,524
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 7.7%7.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Middle Ground: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos