Topic summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video572 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Equestrian Properties results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Quote-first Misdirection, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 205 hits. Analysis detected 999 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (12,554 of 23,421 topics). This Equestrian Properties is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Equestrian Properties
Topic details
Total words: 2,288
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.4% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.0%9.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos