Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 713 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Restoration results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 329 hits . Analysis detected 1,072 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,852 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,818 of 16,562 topics). This Environmental Restoration is better (less manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group. Environmental Restoration
Topic details
Total words: 2,852
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Indoctrination: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst