Topic summary
⁠25%2 analyzed articles/videos668 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Monitoring results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 519 hits. Analysis detected 3,422 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,360 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (13,845 of 15,882 topics). This Environmental Monitoring is better (less manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group.
Environmental Monitoring
Topic details
Total words: 6,360
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510012.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos