Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Environmental Litigation results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 884 hits. Analysis detected 4,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,825 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Environmental Litigation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Environmental Litigation
Topic details
Total words: 3,825
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 23.1%23.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.6%16.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.6%5.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos