Topic summary
ā 9%1 analyzed article/video868 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Lawsuit results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 216 hits. Analysis detected 1,721 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ā 23% (12,786 of 16,562 topics). This Environmental Lawsuit is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Environmental Lawsuit
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 23%Environmental Lawsuit (selected)2%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,472
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510022.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos