Topic summary
⁠17%1 analyzed article/video1,316 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Journalism results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 314 hits. Analysis detected 2,060 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (19,002 of 22,835 topics). This Environmental Journalism is better (less manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
Environmental Journalism
Topic details
Total words: 5,264
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.8% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos