Topic summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video1,977 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Enforcement results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 852 hits. Analysis detected 4,586 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,931 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,274 of 16,216 topics). This Environmental Enforcement is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Environmental Enforcement
Topic details
Total words: 5,931
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos