Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Dna results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 838 hits. Analysis detected 4,209 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (7,897 of 16,313 topics). This Environmental Dna is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
Environmental Dna
Topic details
Total words: 4,908
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 14.2%14.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 17.1%17.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 14.2%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos