Topic summary
⁠7%3 analyzed articles/videos723 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Degradation results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 889 hits. Analysis detected 5,886 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,024 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (15,601 of 15,753 topics). This Environmental Degradation is better (less manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group.
Environmental Degradation
Topic details
Total words: 16,024
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

1% percentile
02550751001.0% percentile
1.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles16K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos