Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos844 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Cleanup results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 1,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,716 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,970 of 16,562 topics). This Environmental Cleanup is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Environmental Cleanup
Topic details
Total words: 2,716
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos