Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,048 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environment & Agriculture results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 457 hits. Analysis detected 1,719 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (14,265 of 16,562 topics). This Environment & Agriculture is better (less manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group.
Environment & Agriculture
Topic details
Total words: 4,192
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510013.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.9%10.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Middle Ground: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos