Topic summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video525 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Technology results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 384 hits. Analysis detected 1,519 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,575 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,479 of 16,562 topics). This Energy Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
Energy Technology
Topic details
Total words: 1,575
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.0% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 24.4%24.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 18.5%18.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.5%9.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Middle Ground: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos