Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Energy Storage results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 742 hits . Analysis detected 2,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,405 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Energy Storage is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Energy Storage
Topic details
Total words: 3,405
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 21.8% 21.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.6% Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst