Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Shock results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 48.3% saturation with 201 hits. Analysis detected 785 faulty-reasoning hits from 416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.5% and a BS Rank of 97% (580 of 16,562 topics). This Energy Shock is worse (more manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group.
Energy Shock
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510096.5% percentile
14.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles416 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 38.0%38.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 48.3%48.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 17.3%17.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 14.4%14.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.1%16.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.7%7.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 48.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 38.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 17.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 14.4%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos