Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video769 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Expenditure results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Overconfidence Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 163 hits. Analysis detected 1,271 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,672 of 16,562 topics). This Energy Expenditure is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Energy Expenditure
Topic details
Total words: 3,076
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510029.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.6%3.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos