Topic summary
â 93% 1 analyzed article/video 511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Chokepoints results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 371 hits . Analysis detected 2,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,533 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of â 83% (2,962 of 16,562 topics). This Energy Chokepoints is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group. Energy Chokepoints
Topic details
Total words: 1,533
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.1% percentile 6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 24.2% 24.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product⌠Sitewide 0.5% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.2% 13.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.6% 15.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst