Topic summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Chokepoints results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 371 hits. Analysis detected 2,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,533 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,962 of 16,562 topics). This Energy Chokepoints is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group.
Energy Chokepoints
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠83%Energy Chokepoints (selected)7%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,533
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510082.1% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.2%24.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.7%13.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.7%11.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.2%13.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.6%15.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

The next Strait of Hormuz⁠80%
Vox⁠50%By Caitlin Dewey⁠77%7/15/2026, 9:00:00 PM