Topic summary
2%1 analyzed article/video1,003 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Endpoint Security results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 144 hits. Analysis detected 1,302 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,012 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (15,711 of 16,437 topics). This Endpoint Security is better (less manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group.
Endpoint Security
Topic details
Total words: 4,012
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

4% percentile
02550751004.4% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.4%3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos