Topic summary
2% 1 analyzed article/video 1,003 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Endpoint Security results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 144 hits . Analysis detected 1,302 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,012 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (15,711 of 16,437 topics). This Endpoint Security is better (less manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group. Endpoint Security
Topic details
Total words: 4,012
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3% No True Scotsman: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst