Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,382 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Encuestas De Opinion results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 36.8% saturation with 2,033 hits. Analysis detected 7,878 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,909 of 16,562 topics). This Encuestas De Opinion is worse (more manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
Encuestas De Opinion
Topic details
Total words: 5,528
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.4% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.3%26.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 36.8%36.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.7%14.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 36.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.1%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos